Is Crime Coin ($CRIME) a rug pull?

As of the latest on-chain check, Crime Coin scored 0/80 on SolFoundry's rug check — Danger · likely rug. The score is based on mint authority, freeze authority, metadata authority, holder concentration (including a separate penalty if one wallet alone holds a large share), and trading pattern, minus penalties for risky Token-2022 extensions (permanent delegate, transfer hook, pause, transfer fee) and for a pool whose liquidity can still be withdrawn. It also subtracts points for a shallow pool (under $15,000 of liquidity, most under $2,000), measured from the SOL or USDC side of the pool and counting only the liquidity that cannot be withdrawn when part of the LP is unlocked. Linked top holders (wallets first funded by the same source), a bundled-launch signal (a bonding curve filled in under 5 minutes) and a ticker-squatting cross-check are shown as unscored context. A safety score is not financial advice; always do your own research before buying.

How can I verify $CRIME myself?

Open the token on Solscan and DexScreener: confirm mint and freeze authority are revoked, check that the top 10 holders do not dominate supply (and that no single wallet holds an outsized share on its own), watch for 24h volume that dwarfs the market cap (a pump-and-dump signature), search the token's symbol for other tokens sharing the same name (ticker squatting), check a Token-2022 mint's extensions for a permanent delegate, transfer hook or transfer fee, and confirm liquidity is locked or burned. SolFoundry Rug Check runs these checks automatically and refreshes on each visit.

Check another token

Rug check

Crime Coin ($CRIME)

9jK7su8LmSi3DUcKZfYJYdvycUkvRQa1EokcusNkpump· Classic SPL

Pool live 1y ago982 holdersLaunched on pump.fun

Explore token

Possible name collision

WarningVerify you have the right mint

24 other tokens named "Crime Coin" ($CRIME), at least one more established. Check the mint before trading.

"More established" means higher liquidity or an older pool. This doesn't prove either token is a scam, but cloning a project's name and symbol to confuse buyers is a common pattern.

7M3gDRgozcumFsiTeXwjB8cYxpg7Q9R7rH7rkw2Fpump
Raydium$346,949Pool live 2y agoDexScreener
86LTgrXrdrYUMBhq6UUuPkENPUh83JX4Vd1Ut6PVpump
PumpSwap$7,365Pool live 3mo agoDexScreener
BN4Z5NtntHhu6p3atEqkeAVi8Bn9Ri2QTv8FD7iupump
PumpSwap$6,168Pool live 12d agoDexScreener
GNBe3at5NDpu45z1foWwrVfdxYhFA5dYWqNm2JMVSCAM
Raydium$4,755Pool live 1y agoDexScreener
925ha4WeQyGLASXQKV5pDH5iovxKeeKmDcFuovnRpump
PumpSwap$3,588Pool live 1y agoDexScreener

+19 more not shown

Inactive market · almost no trading

Almost nothing traded in the last 24h. The structural checks below still answer whether the creator can rug you, but a clean score here is not a sign of a healthy token: nobody is buying or selling it. Treat it as abandoned unless activity returns.

Graduated in 10s · bundled launch signal

This token graduated pump.fun's bonding curve 10s after it opened. Organic demand usually takes hours to fill a curve. In a bundled launch, the creator or a group buys from many wallets in the first seconds, often in one bundled transaction, so the curve fills at once and the buyers look like a crowd. Those wallets bought cheapest and tend to sell into later buyers. A hyped launch can also fill this fast, so it is a signal, not proof. Not scored.

/ 80

Danger

Danger · likely rug

Multiple structural rug vectors are open. The dev can mint, freeze, or rebrand the token. Walk unless you have specific reason to trust them.

5 more issues are listed in the checklist below.

Checked 92 min ago. Results refresh every 5 minutes.

Red flag checklist

6 need attention4 passed1 not verified

Top holders distribution

+0/20

Red flagHow much the top 10 wallets hold

Top listed non-reserve holders hold 71.0%, coordinated dumps possible (22.8% is held by identified reserves or burn addresses and excluded from this score). One wallet alone holds 67.4%. That's a sharper dump risk than the top-10 sum alone suggests, scored as an extra penalty below.

Why it matters: If a few wallets hold most of the supply, they can crash the price by selling. Locked liquidity and burned tokens are left out, so this includes wallet and unidentified program-controlled positions. The published Mayhem agent is reported separately.

Launch concentration

info only

Red flagWho held the supply in the first 10 seconds?

During the first 10 seconds, observed top-10 concentration reached 75.5% of supply at launch; the largest-wallet share reached 67.4%. These are peaks at transaction boundaries, not a sum of purchases. Identified reserves, burn accounts and the published Mayhem agent are excluded. The history stays even if those wallets sell or transfer their tokens inside that window or later. It does not prove shared ownership, a bundle or fraud, and does not measure their holdings today. Not scored.

Why it matters: A small group can acquire a large share at launch and sell into later buyers. Current holders may look dispersed after those sales. We retain the early top-10 and largest-wallet shares separately from current distribution. Concentration is a risk signal, not proof of a bundle or fraud; this context changes the graduated-token verdict without adding or subtracting points, and contributes up to 15 points in the separate bonding score.

Concentration penalty

-30

Red flagExtra points off for heavy top-10 concentration

Subtracted from the total score for the top-10 concentration in Top holders distribution. Aggregate concentration this high keeps hurting the score beyond the flag's own points.

Single-holder penalty

-30

Red flagExtra points off for one dominant wallet

Subtracted for the single largest wallet in Top holders distribution. The part of that risk that doesn't fit in the distribution flag's own points comes off the total here.

Metadata authority

+0/10

CautionCan the name and image be changed?

Active (TSLvdd…). Token can be renamed or rebranded.

Why it matters: With metadata authority the creator can rename or rebrand the token after you buy, a common way to impersonate another project.

Linked wallets

info only

CautionWere top holders funded by the same wallet?

4 of the top 9 holders, together 1.5% of supply, trace back to the same funding wallet (FWzn…ouN5). Wallets funded from one source are often run by one person, so the holder spread may be narrower than it looks. Not scored: shared funding is a strong hint, not proof.

Why it matters: We trace who first funded each top holder. Several holders funded from one source usually means one person spread the supply across wallets to look distributed.

Checks and context

Revoked. Supply is fixed forever.

Why it matters: An open mint authority lets the creator print new supply at any time, diluting every holder. Revoked means the supply is fixed for good.

Revoked. Wallets cannot be frozen.

Why it matters: A freeze authority can lock any wallet's tokens so they can't be sold. Revoked means no one can stop you from selling.

Classic SPL token. Token-2022 extensions (permanent delegate, transfer hook, transfer fee, pause) cannot exist on it.

Why it matters: Token-2022 mints can carry a permanent delegate, a transfer hook, a pause switch or a transfer fee. Each is a lever over holders that the mint and freeze checks never see.

Pool depth: $16,265 on pumpswap. 100% LP Burned, read on-chain: the pool's liquidity cannot be withdrawn.

Why it matters: Burned or permanently locked LP can't be withdrawn. If whoever holds the LP can pull it, holders are left with nothing to sell into: the classic rug.

Bonding curve state is unavailable. Re-check shortly. Not scored.

Why it matters: Progress measures tokens sold out of the original curve reserve, read from the creation event and current curve account. It does not measure the probability of graduation, the number of independent buyers or safety. The concentration check supplies that separate context.

Only $41.02 traded in the last 24h. Too little activity to read a trading pattern, and a sign the market has gone quiet.

Why it matters: 24h volume is weighed against market cap and pool age. Extreme turnover followed by a sharp price drop is the shape of a pump-and-dump.

Socials

Pulled from DexScreener and on-chain metadata. We don't verify these. Open them and judge for yourself. Scammers can fake websites and socials trivially.

X / Twitter@crimetakesover

Telegram@crimetakeover

Verify on-chain

Cross-check our score against the canonical Solana explorers.

Verify on Solscan Lock badge on DexScreener

Share this result. The link is permanent and re-fetches fresh data on each visit.

Share on X

Free for the first 100

Want to launch a token without these red flags?

SolFoundry revokes mint and freeze authority at launch, and metadata authority too if you choose. Liquidity is a separate step: you create a Meteora or Raydium pool and lock it permanently, a lock the check above reads on-chain. Holder distribution still depends on your tokenomics.

Early Supporter perk: zero platform fee on your first launch. Network fees still apply.

Launch on SolFoundry · Free

How does this score work? Read the methodology →

Finalizing. Checking top holders…

Red flag checklist

Top holders distribution

Launch concentration

Concentration penalty

Single-holder penalty

Metadata authority

Linked wallets

Socials

Verify on-chain

Red flag checklist

Top holders distribution

Launch concentration

Concentration penalty

Single-holder penalty

Metadata authority

Linked wallets

Socials

Verify on-chain

Other recent checks